Ubiquitous alternatives: 10 comparable agencies

Pick Collectively if you are a large consumer brand that wants an agency of record for always-on creator marketing.

Same type and model as Ubiquitous, so the comparison is mostly scope and price. Neither publishes a price list, so both need a sales call.

Check first: No pricing is published; engagement is agency-scale and likely requires a direct conversation.

Pick Goat Agency if you want creator campaigns planned, produced and boosted with paid media across many markets at once.

Same type and model as Ubiquitous, so the comparison is mostly scope and price. Neither publishes a price list, so both need a sales call.

Check first: No pricing or fee information is published on the site.

Pick Grynow if you are running campaigns in India, the Middle East or Southeast Asia and want creators sourced across tiers.

Same type and model as Ubiquitous, so the comparison is mostly scope and price. Neither publishes a price list, so both need a sales call.

Check first: No pricing or fee information is published on the homepage.

Pick Gushcloud if you want deals with represented creators across Southeast Asia, the Middle East and North America.

Same type and model as Ubiquitous, so the comparison is mostly scope and price. Neither publishes a price list, so both need a sales call.

Check first: No pricing or fee structure is published for brands.

Pick NeoReach if you have a budget at or above its published $100,000 full-service minimum and want a senior-staffed team.

Same type and model as Ubiquitous, so the comparison is mostly scope and price. It publishes a price where Ubiquitous does not: From $25,000 for UGC content programs; $100,000 minimum for full-service campaigns.

Check first: Published minimums put smaller budgets and one-off projects out of reach.

Pick Obviously if you want an agency to build and run an exclusive creator network for your brand.

Same type and model as Ubiquitous, so the comparison is mostly scope and price. Neither publishes a price list, so both need a sales call.

Check first: No pricing, headquarters, or founding year is disclosed on the site.

Pick Open Influence if you want a bespoke, brand-safety-focused creator programme with in-house production.

Same type and model as Ubiquitous, so the comparison is mostly scope and price. Neither publishes a price list, so both need a sales call.

Check first: No pricing is published; every engagement requires a custom scope and quote.

Pick Socially Powerful if you have a budget at or above its published $50,000 minimum and want a full-service agency.

Same type and model as Ubiquitous, so the comparison is mostly scope and price. It publishes a price where Ubiquitous does not: From $100 per post (nano-influencer fee); $50,000 minimum project size.

Check first: $50,000 minimum project size puts smaller budgets out of reach.

Pick House of Marketers if you are a DTC or app brand that wants an agency built around TikTok creators and TikTok ads.

A different route from Ubiquitous: a UGC and performance creative agency rather than an influencer marketing agency. Neither publishes a price list, so both need a sales call.

Check first: No pricing or fee information is published; engagement starts with a free proposal.

Pick Acorn if you want one agency, now New Engen, to combine creator work with paid media, content and measurement.

A different route from Ubiquitous: a UGC and performance creative agency rather than an influencer marketing agency. Neither publishes a price list, so both need a sales call.

Check first: The Acorn Influence brand and its original scope are no longer distinguishable from New Engen's wider agency services.