Editorial policy
Useful, source-backed guidance for marketers and creator operators.
Evidence standards
Product claims must be traceable to the current UGC Agent implementation. Industry claims require a current primary or authoritative source. Search snippets are not treated as evidence, and variable benchmarks must include context and a reviewed date.
Comparisons
Competitor pages use official product and pricing sources where possible, state when another tool is the better fit, avoid affiliation implications, and are reviewed at least quarterly. We do not publish invented feature gaps or unverifiable customer outcomes.
AI-assisted work
AI may assist with research organization, outlines, and drafting. Vic reviews the final copy, sources, product behavior, internal links, and claims before publication. Scaled filler content is not part of the publishing strategy.
Corrections and updates
Email vic@ugcagent.app with a correction. Substantive changes update the reviewed date. Evergreen articles are reviewed annually; pricing and competitor pages are reviewed quarterly or when material changes are identified.
Source hierarchy
Primary sources are preferred for laws, platform rules, product behavior, and competitor features. Current authoritative industry research may support market context when its sample and date are clear. Search-result snippets, unattributed statistics, copied summaries, and anonymous marketing claims are not treated as final evidence.
Publication checklist
Before publication, Vic checks that the title and page job are unique, the introduction answers the search intent, variable claims are qualified, sources support the surrounding sentence, internal links are relevant, FAQs are visible without restricted FAQPage schema, and the article contains no fabricated experience or customer outcome.
Commercial independence
UGC Agent comparison pages are written to explain operating-model differences, not to manufacture a winner. They disclose the source and review date, identify when the competing workflow is the better fit, and do not use affiliate relationships, copied testimonials, or unverified feature gaps as evidence.
Turn the brief into a creator list.
Try a restricted sourcing run free, then upgrade only when you need more visible or monthly creator leads.