From our creator index
- 24,032
- UGC-qualified creators indexed
- 1,706
- median followers
- 31%
- under 1,000 followers
- 47%
- in the 1k to 5k band
- 32.1%
- with a portfolio link
- 22,393 / 1,639
- Instagram / TikTok
Snapshot of 14 September 2026. Every figure counts creators that passed the app's own UGC qualification gate; the index holds no engagement or rate fields, so none are quoted. Creator listed here? Request removal: hello@ugcagent.app.
Ten briefs for proving the product does what the page claims
Each line below is a brief rather than a concept: a subject, something that has to be visible, and the hesitation it removes. They come in pairs because a creator who films both in one sitting reuses the setup and charges you once for it.
- The hard caseFirst: the product used on the worst example in the creator's own home, the burnt pan or the drawer of tangled cables. Second: the same job attempted without it, so the difficulty is established before the fix arrives.
- The countFirst: how many uses there are in one container, filmed as a tally across a week. Second: the very last use scraped out of it, which answers the value question nobody asks out loud.
- The timerFirst: the whole job in real time with a clock in frame and no commentary. Second: the same job done the old way, timed the same way, for the comparison you did not have to claim.
- The wrong expectationFirst: the creator says what they assumed it would do, then shows what it actually does. Second: the thing it is bad at, named plainly and filmed anyway.
- The detailFirst: the mechanism at close range, filling the frame, no face and no voice. Second: the same mechanism after a month of use, so the wear is visible rather than described.
Ten briefs for proving somebody kept using it
The second half of the list is about continuity. A demonstration proves capability; these prove habit, which is the part a hesitant buyer is actually weighing up.
- The slot in the dayFirst: the product inside a sequence with the time said out loud, these are the eleven minutes before the school run. Second: the same sequence on a bad day, rushed and half finished.
- The second personFirst: somebody else in the household using it, briefed and consenting. Second: the reaction of a person who had no idea what it was for.
- The reorderFirst: filmed while buying it again, the finished one still on the counter. Second: the shelf where three of them stand in a row with the dates visible.
- The travel versionFirst: how it packs, what goes in the bag beside it, what got left at home. Second: it being used somewhere inconvenient, a hotel bathroom or a car park.
- The question from the commentsFirst: a buying question typed on screen and answered in one breath. Second: the creator's own answer to why they still own it six weeks later.
Matching an idea to a category we can actually staff
An idea is worth only as much as the shortlist behind it. Our coverage runs 93.2% Instagram, 22,393 creators there against 1,639 on TikTok, so a brief written around a convention that only exists on one app narrows the pool before you send a message.
Depth decides which of these briefs you can run several times over. 15 categories hold enough creators to staff a batch, and the timer and hard-case briefs fill easily from home, food and fitness profiles. The second-person and slot-in-the-day briefs are easiest in parenting, where the household is already on camera and nobody has to be persuaded to appear. Travel-version briefs need somebody who is genuinely going somewhere, which makes timing rather than shortlisting the hard part.
Language and location move the shortlist more than people expect. 4,250 profiles are Spanish-language and 11 countries carry at least a hundred creators, so an idea that depends on a spoken script has a different pool to one that depends on hands and a voiceover. Decide who exists before you decide what to film.
The ideas that only work once
Some of these are non-renewable. The wrong-expectation brief works exactly once per creator per product, because once somebody has told their audience what they assumed, they cannot un-assume it. The second person only surprises the first time too; after that it is a performance of surprise and viewers notice.
Launch-moment ideas expire on a date. Anything built around the first week of availability, a seasonal window, or an editing convention that is currently everywhere will read as late three months on, and nobody will point it out to you. Spend that budget early or skip it.
The renewable ones are all built on time passing: the reorder, the month-later detail, the shelf with dates on it. Those improve with repetition because the evidence accumulates, and a creator you booked in spring can film the second half of a pair in autumn without reshooting the first.
Compressing one idea onto a single page
A brief that runs four pages gets skimmed and half followed. One page, six blocks, and anything that is not a constraint either goes in an appendix or goes away.
- The hesitation, in one sentenceWhich doubt this clip exists to remove. If you cannot write that sentence, what you have is a mood rather than a brief.
- The must-showThe action, texture or screen that has to be in frame, and roughly when it should appear.
- What you are not asking forNo script read aloud, no logo first, no borrowed audio. A short list of prohibitions saves a round of revisions.
- The shape of the deliverableCount, runtime range, orientation, captions, and whether the raw clips are included or extra.
- Rights and fee togetherWhere the clip will run, whether media money sits behind it, the length of the term, the territories, the fee, and when it gets paid, written as one block so nobody has to send a second email.
- One date, one revision roundA delivery date and a single round of changes. The campaign brief generator lays these fields out if answering prompts beats drafting from a blank page.
Questions
How many of these should one creator get?
One pair per booking. A creator with two related briefs and a single setup delivers both properly. A creator handed six delivers four thin versions and one good one. Book more creators instead of stacking more ideas onto the same person.
Should the creator choose the idea instead?
Give them the hesitation and let them decide how to film it. The brands that get the best work specify what has to be proved and what has to be visible, then leave the setting, the wording and the order to the person who knows their own audience.
What do we do with an idea that did not work?
Work out whether the idea failed or the execution did before binning it. The same brief filmed with clean audio and an earlier product reveal is a different asset. Rerun it once with one variable changed, then drop it for good.