From our creator index
- 24,032
- UGC-qualified creators indexed
- 1,706
- median followers
- 31%
- under 1,000 followers
- 47%
- in the 1k to 5k band
- 32.1%
- with a portfolio link
- 22,393 / 1,639
- Instagram / TikTok
Snapshot of 14 September 2026. Every figure counts creators that passed the app's own UGC qualification gate; the index holds no engagement or rate fields, so none are quoted. Creator listed here? Request removal: hello@ugcagent.app.
Paid per deliverable, not per month
There is no UGC salary. You are paid for a named asset carrying named rights, and the same forty-five seconds of footage can be worth three figures or four depending on where it runs and for how long. Anybody quoting a monthly income for this is describing their own booking volume, and nobody is obliged to pay you at that level.
The benchmark table on this page comes out of our rate calculator. It is a 2026 pricing model built to cost a scope, and every cell exists to cost a scope, not to record money that changed hands. What we keep about creators is follower bands, categories and whether a portfolio exists; there is no field anywhere for fees or engagement, so we cannot show you a real invoice and will not imply that we can.
The tiers in that model are follower bands, not seniority: nano below 5,000, micro 5,000 to 25,000, mid 25,000 to 100,000, established above 100,000. Read the spread with that in mind: just 10.8% of our qualified pool sits above ten thousand followers. The right-hand columns describe a small minority of the working market, not a destination everyone reaches.
Scope moves the figure faster than the column does. Stack a raw footage add-on and a twelve-month paid usage term onto the shortest nano video and the model returns $350 for the package, which is above a micro creator's bare $225 for the same runtime. That gap is the whole argument for pricing the job instead of quoting a number.
| Scenario | What shipped | Modelled total |
|---|---|---|
| Quiet month, nano tier | One short video at $150 plus one raw footage add-on at $50 | $200 |
| Steady month, nano tier | Three short videos at $150 plus two extra openings at $30 | $510 |
| Steady month, micro tier | Three 30-60s videos at $295 with raw footage at $70 each | $1,095 |
| Strong month, micro tier | Four 30-60s videos at $295, two photo sets at $225, three-month paid usage on two of them at $55 | $1,740 |
Every price here is a calculator output for planning. None of it is survey data, and plenty of real months contain no paid bookings at all.
What a month actually adds up to at realistic job volumes
Volume is the variable nobody publishes, and it swings harder than any price in the table. Three months in, one paid booking a month is a normal rhythm, with two empty months in between. With three repeat clients and a settled price list, four or five deliverables a month is achievable, and January will still be dead.
The scenarios below multiply modelled prices by job counts chosen to be plausible rather than flattering. It is arithmetic on estimates, so use the totals to sanity-check an offer sitting in your inbox, not as evidence of what anyone took home.
Repeat the middle scenario twelve times and you land near $13,000 before tax and before expenses, and no year looks like that because the work does not arrive evenly. That is the honest shape of it: at steady micro volume the model describes a decent part-time income, preceded by a slow half-year in which you pitch far more than you film.
Two things change the picture more than raising a price ever does. Repeat clients delete the pitching hours, which are unpaid and early on outnumber the filming hours several times over. And a retainer of two videos a month at a modelled $295 each is $590 landing without a fresh negotiation, which beats a single higher-priced job you had to chase for three weeks.
The levers that move a fee fastest, in order
Pull these from the top. The first two can be pulled this quarter; the last one takes years and is mostly out of your hands.
- The licence and its termEasily the fastest. In the model, twelve months of paid usage adds $225 at micro tier where three months adds $55, so the same clip with a longer licence prices close to double the bare video. Always quote a term and never agree to full rights.
- Add-ons the ad account already needsExtra openings and raw clips cost you almost nothing and are worth a lot to whoever is testing creative. At micro tier the model adds $70 for raw and $45 per extra opening, so three openings and a clip pack take a $295 deliverable to $500 with no second shoot.
- Being narrow about what you filmCreators known for one category get asked for a quote instead of a portfolio. There is room for that: 47.9% of qualified profiles never state a category at all, which makes a clear one unusually cheap to claim.
- Delivering when you said you wouldFiles named, captions burned in, sent on the agreed date. That is what produces a second booking, and the second booking is the real pay rise because nobody has to be convinced again.
- Ads run through your handleWhitelisting is a separate product with its own fee, modelled at $70 for a micro creator, and it is the point where audience size finally starts to matter to the price.
- Follower count, lastIt shifts you a column eventually, and nothing you film this month will hurry that along. Treat it as a by-product of shipping work, not a strategy.
Gifted product is not income, and when to take it anyway
A gifted collaboration pays you in an object you now own. It cannot be banked, it does not cover rent, and counting a shelf of free serum as earnings is how creators end up working full-time hours at a negative margin. Enter it as zero in your own books and you will price everything else better.
Three situations still make it worth doing. The product costs real money and you wanted it anyway. The piece fills a visible gap, such as a category you have never shipped. Or the brand is small, you are talking to the founder, and the gifted job is a paid test in all but name, in which case say that out loud and ask what the paid version looks like.
Put boundaries in writing even when no money moves. One deliverable, organic posting on their side only, no paid amplification, no perpetual licence, no exclusivity. A brand asking for three openings, raw clips and a year of ad rights in return for a moisturiser is buying a $500 package for the price of postage, taking the model on this page as the yardstick.
Disclosure applies to gifted work exactly as it does to paid work. Free product is a material connection, it has to be disclosed clearly and up front, and the FTC in the United States along with the ASA and CMA in the United Kingdom enforce that. Everything here is general information and not legal or tax advice.
Tax, expenses, and the part of the fee you never keep
The invoice total is not the amount you keep. Self-employment tax, payment processing, products you bought yourself, an editing subscription, phone storage, postage on returns and every unpaid pitching hour all come out of it. Track them from the first paid job rather than reconstructing a whole year in April with a shoebox of receipts.
Move a fixed share of every payment into a separate account the day it clears, and do not touch that account. What share depends on where you live, so take the figure from your own tax authority or an accountant rather than from a creator explaining it in a Reel.
Gifted product is taxable in some jurisdictions even though it never resembled money, which is another reason to log each item at its retail value as it arrives. Keep the emails, the briefs and the delivery confirmations too; a paper trail is what protects you when a brand later claims a deliverable never showed up.
Payment terms are part of your price. Thirty days to pay, a deposit on anything scope-heavy, a stated late fee, and no final files released before the deposit lands. A modelled $650 established-tier video paid ninety days late has already cost you the option to buy whatever you needed for the next shoot.
Benchmark rates, tier by tier
| Deliverable | Nanounder 5k followers | Micro5k to 25k | Mid25k to 100k | Established100k and up |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UGC video, 15 to 30sper finished video | $150$100 to $250 | $225$150 to $350 | $375$250 to $600 | $650$400 to $1,000 |
| UGC video, 30 to 60sper finished video | $195$130 to $325 | $295$195 to $455 | $490$325 to $780 | $845$520 to $1,300 |
| Photo set, 5 edited photosper set | $175$100 to $250 | $225$125 to $350 | $350$200 to $550 | $550$300 to $900 |
| Raw footage add-onper video | $50$50 to $75 | $70$50 to $105 | $115$75 to $180 | $195$120 to $300 |
| Hook variationper extra opener | $30$25 to $50 | $45$30 to $70 | $75$50 to $120 | $130$80 to $200 |
| Paid usage, 3 monthsadded to production | $40$25 to $65 | $55$40 to $90 | $95$65 to $150 | $165$100 to $250 |
| Paid usage, 12 monthsadded to production | $150$100 to $250 | $225$150 to $350 | $375$250 to $600 | $650$400 to $1,000 |
| Whitelistingads from the creator's handle | $45$30 to $75 | $70$45 to $105 | $115$75 to $180 | $195$120 to $300 |
Estimates, not quotes. Run your own scope through the UGC rate calculator and treat the output as a planning range.
Questions
How much do UGC creators make per video?
Our model prices the shortest vertical deliverable at $150 in the nano column, $225 at micro and $650 at established tier, and those are planning figures rather than reported pay. The real answer moves with the licence, the number of openings, whether raw clips are included and how fast it has to land. Cost the job, then the clip.
Can UGC be a full-time income?
For some people, after a long runway, and usually on the back of repeat clients or agency work rather than fresh pitching. Run the scenarios above before betting a rent payment on it: steady micro-tier volume in the model lands nearer a part-time wage once tax and expenses come out, and empty months come with the territory rather than signalling a mistake.
Can you get paid UGC work without followers?
For content-only jobs, yes, because what is being bought is footage and a licence rather than access to an audience. Under a thousand followers covers 31% of everybody we list, and those creators are there because their profiles show evidence of real brand work, which is the only thing the screen checks. Audience size starts to count when the brief asks you to post it yourself.